An interesting debate... The paper that my friend on Lake Herman says is peddling smut has been making news lately, fighting for such things as state employee salaries, lists of buddies that hunt with the governor, Mike Rounds' schedule of his family thankgsiving dinner and when he has his bowel movements... hey, it's on the taxpayer's dime!
And apparently some folks feel that if the Argus is going to be the "voice of the people", there should be some accountability. I are one of these people.
Look, I'm not going to say the AL "Speaks for me" or doesn't. But if it's going to go around parading itself as the "champion of the average citizen," isn't it considered reasonable to be held to some kind of public scrutiny, perhaps, even some third-party examination?
Which gives me the idea... an ombudsman!
Okay, I know what you're going to ask... "What the HELL is an ombudsman?" Well, basically, an ombudsman is a person, independent of the media organization that acts as the "voice of the people". They take suggestions, handle inquiries about procedures, and reports them to the masses. If a privately-held cable channel like ESPN can have an ombudsman, why can't a paper that supposedly represents a larger cross-section o f people?
Will IM29 push through when the polls close tonight?
-
All but one of the Trump voters I talked to today also voted for pot. One
of them said Trump and weed “go hand in hand, don’t they?” A of them few
voted ...
1 hour ago
1 comment:
"third-party examination"? that's us! ;-)
Post a Comment